Articles

  • OMS

    Organisation Mondiale de la Santé

  • SIH

    Système d’information hospitaliernull

  • Rapport de la cour des comptes sur les données personnelles gérées par l’Assurance maladie

    La Cour des comptes dénonce le verrouillage et la mauvaise utilisation des données santé gérées par l’Assurance maladie dans un rapport confidentiel cité en exclusivité par le site Acteurs publics le 19 avril 2016. L’autorité y déplore la faible utilisation par les pouvoirs publics des cette base « au potentiel exceptionnel », les freins à son l’ouverture et ses nombreuses failles de sécurité. La France disposerait de la plus grande base du monde : chaque année, 1,2 milliard de feuilles de soins, anonymisées, alimentent ainsi le Sniiram.

  • Accord stratégique : Bluelinea se rapproche d’Hager pour son développement international

    Bluelinea, spécialiste français des objets et services connectés liés au maintien à domicile vient de conclure un accord stratégique avec le groupe allemand Hager.

    Cet accord avec un leader des solutions et services pour installations électriques dans les bâtiments a pour objectif la création d’une société commune qui permettra à Bluelinea de déployer son offre en Allemagne.

    Selon les termes de ce partenariat, Hager Group va souscrire à une augmentation de capital de Bluelinea à hauteur de 3 millions d’euros et intégrera le conseil de surveillance.

    « La connexion des systèmes intelligents d’Hager aux plateformes de téléassistance Bluelinéa va aider les seniors à rester au contact de leur famille, du personnel de soins et des fournisseurs de services spécialisés », a souligné le président de Bluelinéa, Laurent Levasseur, à la conclusion de cet accord stratégique dans lequel, a-t-il précisé, « Bluelinéa apporte sa connaissance du monde de la silver économie et du modèle économique de l’abonnement à un bouquet de services ».

  • IDC

    International Data Conseilnull

  • Marché des wearables : Fitbit et Xiaomi devant Apple

    Au premier trimestre 2016, la montre connectée d’Apple se serait vendue à 1,5 millions d’exemplaires, selon les estimations du cabinet IDC rendues publiques le 17 mai 2016, soit 7,5% des parts d’un marché mondial de 19,7 millions d’unités en croissance de 67,2% su un an. Fitbit conserve sa place de leader avec 4,8 millions de bracelets connectés vendus, soit une part de marché de 24,5%. Apple est également devancé dans le domaine des wearables par le groupe chinois Xiaomi qui s’est adjugé 19% du marché avec 3,7 millions d’unités vendues. Le cabinet IDC note que ce résultat de Xiaomi est basé uniquement sur la Chine et que « la difficulté pour ce groupe va rester de s’étendre au-delà de son marché domestique ».

    Les analystes d’IDC relèvent que le marché des wearables « continue de mûrir et de s’étendre », mais qu’il devient « un marché encombré »

  • Salon Enova Paris : Paris, les 14 et 15/09/2016

    Le salon des technologies et des services Enova est une plateforme de convergence des technologies de l’électronique, de la mesure, de la vision et de l’optique qui fédère les acteurs de l’industrie et de la recherche à l’affut de solutions innovantes pour leurs projets de développement.

  • Assurance maladie : une nouvelle application pour Ameli

    La nouvelle application mobile de l’Assurance maladie mise en service le 27 avril 2016 permet en recherchant un professionnel de santé de retrouver tarifs, horaires, spécialités.

    La précédente version créée en 2013 permettait déjà de sélectionner médecins, infirmiers, établissements de santé en fonction de critères particuliers. Il est désormais possible de prendre rendez-vous directement via la fonction « click to call », de trouver les services d’urgences les plus proches ou de visualiser l’itinéraire à suivre via un système de géolocalisation.

    L’application permet à chaque assuré de gérer son compte (consultation des remboursements, modifications des données personnelles, téléchargement d’attestations).

  • EHR Basics and the Future of Interoperability Halley Suitt Tucker

    The healthcare industry in the United States is fighting a battle that’s been going on for decades. I’m not talking about the battle against cancer, the Zika virus or even ebola. I’m talking about the battle over electronic health records management (EHR). Despite amazing progress in these other areas of disease, the reality of the top hospitals, medical practices and healthcare networks in the U.S. is that keeping patient records safe, secure, up-to-date and easy to share has not been solved.
    Most patients entering a hospital or ER in the U.S. still expect to fill out paper forms on a clipboard before any other healthcare concern is addressed. Healthcare records share an ironic fate of often being unavailable when needed by a patient and doctor but available for hacking when an EHR data breech occurs. The leading EHR companies are silos, disconnected from other providers and holding the healthcare industry back from real integration across the healthcare ecosystem. The key concern now is interoperability and new digital health startups are beginning to challenge these older established EHR providers. We may finally be leaving the back office paper medical records paradigm behind, but it’s been a long and painful process.

    Different terms, one reality

    Even the many terms for managing patient data demonstrate the evolution in how the industry views the business of collecting and sharing healthcare records.  ERM (Electronic Medical Records) was the earlier term used and now usually means digital records kept at one location, mostly not shared with the patient nor with the whole healthcare system. EHR (Electronic Health Records) is the current acronym and used to describe healthcare data that can be “created, managed, consulted by authorized clinicians and staff across more than one healthcare organization” according to The National Alliance for Health Information Technology. EHR records should also be shared with the patient creating new challenges in terms of transparency.

    Other important acronyms in this area include CMS (The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) previously known as the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA). This is the federal agency within the United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) that administers Medicare and works with the state governments on a range of healthcare standards and has responsibilities for administrative simplification standards from the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of (HIPAA).

    Then there is The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), which authorizes CMS to provide reimbursement incentives for doctors and hospitals who have qualified as “Meaningful Users” of the EHR system. These incentive payments started in 2011 and as of 2015, those using EHR had to be in compliance with the government’s “Meaningful Use” definition or could be subject to financial penalties under Medicare.

    Lack of interoperabilty

    For many years, the leading EMR provider has been a Wisconsin-based company called “Epic” and has been under fire lately for being unwilling to put interoperability ahead of competition with others in the EHR landscape. A recent story in liberal magazine Mother Jones by Patrick Caldwell tells the story in one headline, “We’ve Spent Billions to Fix Our Medical Records, and They’re Still a Mess. Here’s Why.” He discusses how most of the healthcare companies in the U.S. have fought to compete against one another and now are being asked to cooperate by the government to promote new solutions. Lack of interoperability is not an easy malady to cure, but is essential if EHR will reach the level it must for the future of digital healthcare integration in the U.S.  

    Some startups are moving the lines

    There is light at the end of the tunnel as new startups like Redox are beginning to change the game.  Redox is made up of former Epic employees who left to found their company in July 2014. They have created API integrating software with EHRs. Redox took part in the demo day at DreamIT Health Accelerator in Baltimore. They got $3.53M in funding by October 2015.

    Other digital health startups working in the EHR area are also looking at an API integration model like Health Catalyst and Mulesoft.  Practice Fusion is a free, cloud-based solution, which relies on advertising and partnerships. Practice Fusion has gotten a lot of funding (US$155.02M) and a lot of press as it is backed by Peter Thiel, the early PayPal co-founder.

  • Rebecca Woodcock: « Startups of e-health need to be smart »

    Rebecca Woodcock is Digital Health Enterpreneur-in-Residence (EIR) from venture fund 500 Startups in San Francisco, she is interviewed about the regulatory environment after the Theranos fall from grace. Rebecca was in the first class of the digital health accelerator Rock Health in San Francisco, as CEO and founder of digital health startup CakeHealth, which she sold in 2015.

    Theranos, the digital health unicorn startup that launched an innovative blood-testing device named Edison, has gone from being the hottest company in Silicon Valley to a hobbled startup in trouble, currently under investigation by federal prosecutors and the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC).

    Does the regulatory environment in healthcare mean digital health startups need to move slowly?  

     Regulation means that startups in digital health need to be smart on where to move fast and where to move slowly.  The first step is to deeply understand the regulation and how the startup’s product or service fits into that regulation.

     U.S. healthcare regulation is mysterious to most, but if you become the expert in how regulation applies to your type of business, that will separate your startups from most others who try to avoid it.  That alone will set a competitive barrier that others will not cross.  How do you become an expert?  Study how top companies and your competitors are interpreting the law, in addition to reading the law and government guidance.  

    We know Theranos did some things wrong and is being investigated now by the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission).  What did they do right?

    The thing they did right was running traditional normal blood draw tests along side their finger prick tests for tests that were not FDA approved or for diseases in which they do not have a test developed.  They also have had a couple of wins with the FDA approving tests that can be done outside of the traditional laboratory setting with equal accuracy.  This is a huge step forward for deconstructing the limitations and cost of the laboratory environment, which will result in lower cost and making these tests much more accessible.

    Is an accelerator program focused on digital health and medtech the best environment for new digital health companies — if so, why? 

     Building a company is difficult, no matter who you are, so an accelerator will help provide support and resources that will benefit anyone (assuming the accelerator is good).  Breaking into healthcare is even more difficult, so taking as much support and momentum you can get will only help with the uphill battle.  There are landmines everywhere when you are an early stage company, and incumbent will not like your existence, even when they pretend to.  All the extra support will be worth it. 

    Are the regulators efforts to monitor digital health essential or are they trying to slow down innovation?

    Regulation is essential in order to avoid products that can harm us and violations to our privacy, however it hasn’t been easy for startups to get the help and clarity they need to navigate these regulations, and often requires lots of hurdles, long processes, and expensive legal fees. It’s not a friendly environment for a startup that needs to move fast and avoid the regulatory process because of limited capital. I would encourage startups to build regulatory approval into their growth plan and execute on it as soon as they have the means.